Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
newcastle-planning [2016/04/28 12:01] 127.0.0.1newcastle-planning [2016/05/13 22:08] – [Potential Current / Future Party Topics] 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom (Planning Page) ===== ===== Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom (Planning Page) =====
 +
 +Poster and some visuals currently hosted on Flickr at [[https://www.flickr.com/photos/137781729@N08/albums/72157667234594126]].
  
 ====Groups Contacted==== ====Groups Contacted====
Line 63: Line 65:
 |[[https://jitsi.org|Jitsi]] |Probably the most effective "drop-in Skype replacement" at the moment but I'd want to be careful not to mislead anyone into thinking that metadata analysis wasn't possible with this - it is, due to its use of centralised XMPP services. |  | |[[https://jitsi.org|Jitsi]] |Probably the most effective "drop-in Skype replacement" at the moment but I'd want to be careful not to mislead anyone into thinking that metadata analysis wasn't possible with this - it is, due to its use of centralised XMPP services. |  |
 |XMPP+OTR |This has been popular at CryptoParties for a while, but the additional security offered by Ricochet means it is effectively deprecated. Can be covered if people think it is particularly a good idea. |  | |XMPP+OTR |This has been popular at CryptoParties for a while, but the additional security offered by Ricochet means it is effectively deprecated. Can be covered if people think it is particularly a good idea. |  |
 +
 +Regarding the various different instant messengers, there's an accessible and up-to-date blog post here: https://blog.grobox.de/2016/briar-next-step-of-the-crypto-messenger-evolution/
  
 === Miscellaneous === === Miscellaneous ===