Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
oxford [2019/11/28 12:40] – [Schedule] 127.0.0.1oxford [2019/11/28 12:50] – [Schedule] 127.0.0.1
Line 49: Line 49:
 |7.50pm| [[https://twitter.com/silkiecarlo|@SilkieCarlo]], director of [[https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk|Big Brother Watch]]| 2. **Big Brother is watching you..!** The surveillance state & how to fight it| |7.50pm| [[https://twitter.com/silkiecarlo|@SilkieCarlo]], director of [[https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk|Big Brother Watch]]| 2. **Big Brother is watching you..!** The surveillance state & how to fight it|
 |8.00pm| [[https://twitter.com/julia_slupska|Julia Slupska]]| 3. **Cybersecurity as a Feminist Issue**: Julia Slupska is a doctoral student at Oxford's Centre for Doctoral Training in Cybersecurity. Don't miss this flashtalk on how feminist theory and activism can shed light on cybersecurity blind spots and make cybersecurity research/industry more inclusive and mindful of how security design interacts with broader power dynamics| |8.00pm| [[https://twitter.com/julia_slupska|Julia Slupska]]| 3. **Cybersecurity as a Feminist Issue**: Julia Slupska is a doctoral student at Oxford's Centre for Doctoral Training in Cybersecurity. Don't miss this flashtalk on how feminist theory and activism can shed light on cybersecurity blind spots and make cybersecurity research/industry more inclusive and mindful of how security design interacts with broader power dynamics|
-|8.10pm| [[https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/krafft/|Dr Peaks Krafft]]| 4. **Why AI ethics will not end surveillance**: How the institutions that are building the global digital surveillance state are also funding AI ethics research.|+|8.10pm| [[https://twitter.com/_pmkr|Dr Peaks Krafft]]| 4. **Why AI ethics will not end surveillance**: How the institutions that are building the global digital surveillance state are also funding AI ethics research.|
 |8.20pm| [[https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/team/anders-sandberg/|Anders Sandberg]]| 5. **The transparent society: utopia, dystopia or just suburbia?** Renowned polymath Anders Sandberg of Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute examines the ideas in David Brin's excellent 1998 [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Transparent_Society|book]], how things have turned out, and some of the problems with even perfectly transparent environments that indicate why we need privacy| |8.20pm| [[https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/team/anders-sandberg/|Anders Sandberg]]| 5. **The transparent society: utopia, dystopia or just suburbia?** Renowned polymath Anders Sandberg of Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute examines the ideas in David Brin's excellent 1998 [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Transparent_Society|book]], how things have turned out, and some of the problems with even perfectly transparent environments that indicate why we need privacy|
 |8.30pm| [[https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/max.vankleek/|Max Van Kleek]]| 6. **Autonomy enhancing technologies**: A brief overview of work from the Human-Centred AI group at Oxford's Department of Computer Science.|  |8.30pm| [[https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/max.vankleek/|Max Van Kleek]]| 6. **Autonomy enhancing technologies**: A brief overview of work from the Human-Centred AI group at Oxford's Department of Computer Science.|