Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
vitees [2013/07/18 12:10] – created petttervitees [2013/07/18 12:37] – [Cryptoparty Invitees] samthetechie
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Cryptoparty Invitees ====== ===== Cryptoparty Invitees ======
  
-Cryptoparties should ideally have a rather varied group attending. Mainly, it is a means for activists, journalists and the general public to learn how to use crypto in practise, meaning invitations should go out to:+Cryptoparties shouldideallyhave a rather varied group attending. Mainly, it is intended for the general public to learn crypto but it is of special interest to journalists, human rights activists, environmental activists and other groups to learn and use crypto day-to-day meaning that targeted invitations should be made by organisers and go out to:
  
-  * Media organisations based nearby +=====Who?===== 
-  * Activist groups of various kinds+  * Media organisations (ranging from "The Media" to citizen journalists and bloggers) 
 +  * Centres for Investigative Journalism (e.g. CIJ)
   * Human rights organisations (e.g. Amnesty)   * Human rights organisations (e.g. Amnesty)
-  * Other groups who rely on secure communications (lawyers, psychologists, priests, doctors) +  * Environmental activist organisations (e.g. Greenpeace) 
-  * Computer- and crypto-savvy people who can assist in teaching, e.g. the local hackerspace or LUG+  * Other professional groups and their clients / patients who rely on secure and anonymous communications (e.g. lawyers, psychologists, priests, doctors) 
 +  * Computer- and crypto-savvy people who can assist in teaching, e.g. the local hackerspace,  LUG (linux user group). 
 + 
 +=====Why?===== 
 +cc #journalists #bloggers #activists #writers #doctors #priests #lawyers #psychologists #academics @CryptoParty_ Why we need more "positive-stories" about Crypto https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bulE9vErfg&t=26m44s 
 + 
 +We need to demonstrate what this privacy technology is really useful for so we can win the debate that cryptography is only useful for terrorists, child pornographers, criminals and money launderers. We need to show how cryptography can be used by human rights activists,  environmental activists and even the cancer patient that needs the anonymity and these positive stories need to get lots of attention. 
 + 
 +There are also currently people being fired for what they say on personal blogs about their employers but there are also whistleblowers and we need to find these examples and make sure that the cryptography that **was** a part of the story, **becomes** a part of the story. If it was not a part of the story, then we can review the story and then recast it as a "what if" crypto was involved in order to demonstrate how Cryptography might have helped improve the real outcomes for the real people involved.